$name

While NPWT has wide clinical adoption,¹ it can create significant administrative challenges - especially at a time when hospital budgets are already stretched thin.²

Is your current NPWT program:

• Compromising clinical outcomes?
• Creating operational headaches?
• Costing you financially?

We aim to help you address the current challenges of NPWT.

Use our traditional and single-use technology to help you cut through the complexity of NPWT.

RENASYS^◊ Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (tNPWT)

• For acute and chronic wounds with high levels of exudate
• Shown to offer comparable performance and efficacy to V.A.C.^{TM 3}
• Facilitates a seamless transition from acute to post-acute care through our partnership with Rotech^TM

PICO^◊ Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (sNPWT)

• For acute and chronic wounds with low to medium exudate levels, as well as closed surgical incisions
• Single-use design simplifies training, which may free-up nursing time⁴
• Clinicians reported "good" or "excellent" patient experiences for 92% of patients using the PICO System^*4

Not only do you save considerable efficiencies by using one vendor, but you can also spend less on tNPWT - and the associated pump rental, rental and consumable fees - by using sNPWT on appropriate wounds instead. The example of estimated cost savings illustrated is not based on a real customer account.^** Your results will vary.

Read the international consensus panel recommendations for the optimization of traditional and single-use negative pressure wound therapy, and download a decision-making tool for clinical practice

Read international expert consensus

Download clinical tool