PICO◊ Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System

Featuring proprietary AIRLOCK◊ Technology, PICO sNPWT has shown clinical efficacy in the treatment of closed surgical incisions and hard-to-heal wounds, with patient-centric features and the capacity to treat two incisions from one device (depending on system choice)*1-10

840x840-PX-PICO-7-Global.png

Product features

Surgical incisions

PICO sNPWT is indicated for all closed surgical incisions, including (but not limited to):*

  • Cardiothoracic surgery
  • Abdominal surgery
  • Obstetric and gynaecological surgery
  • Orthopaedic surgery
  • Breast surgery
  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Flaps and grafts
PICO-INCISION-HERO-840x840-PX.png

Hard-to-heal wounds

Use PICO sNPWT in the treatment of hard-to-heal chronic and acute wounds, such as:*

  • Diabetic foot ulcers
  • Venous leg ulcers
  • Surgical wound dehiscence
PICO-HARD-TO-HEAL-HERO-840x840-PX.png

Disclaimer

* Wounds greater than 2cm must use a wound filler alongside PICO sNPWT. Bilateral incision management available with the PICO 7Y System only.

**Compared to the PICO 7 and PICO 1.6 Systems.

***Demonstrated in benchtop testing.

Citations

1. Hudson DA, et al. Int Wound J. 2015;12(2):195-201.

2. Smith+Nephew 2019. Internal Report. RD/18/134 V2.

3. Smith+Nephew 2017. Internal Report. DS/17/253/R.

4. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal report EO AWM. PCS230.001 v2.

5. Saunders C, et al. BJS open. 2021 Jan;5(1):zraa003.

6. Kirsner R, et al. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2019;27(5):519 - 529.

7. Payne C, et al. ePlasty, 14, 2014.

8.Smith+Nephew 2015. Internal Report. ST865 CT09/02.

9. Sharp E. Journal of Wound Care. 2013;22(10):S5-S9.

10. Stryja J, et al. Prolekare. 2015.

11. Gilchrist B, et al. Paper presented at: SAWC; 2020; Virtual.

12. Hurd T, et al. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2014;60(3):30-36.

13. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. RD/18/137.

14. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. DS.18.066.R.

15. Dowsett C, et al. Wounds Int, 8(2), pp.52-58

16. Galiano RD, et al. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 6(1)

17. Holt R, et al. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2015; 76(4), pp.217-223

18. Rossington A. 2015. A prospective, open, non-comparative, multicentre study to evaluate the functionality and dressing performance of a new negative pressure enhanced dressing (NPED) in acute wounds. CT09/02, May

19. Sharpe A, et al. Wounds UK. 2018;14(3):80-137.

20. Myers D, et al. Paper presented at: EWMA; 2018; Krakow.

21. Smith+Nephew 2014. Internal Report. OR-DOF/42.

22. Irwin GW, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(e2667).

23. Casey C. Paper presented at: EWMA; 2019; Gothenburg, Sweden.

24. Smith+Nephew 2019. Internal Report. RD/19/006.

25. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. RD/18/132.

Title

Text

Explore