ALLEVYN◊ ADHESIVE
Adhesive Hydrocellular Foam Dressing
More information coming soon.
References
1. Leonard S, McCluskey P, Long S, Butters V, Winter R, Smith G. An evaluation of Allevyn™ Adhesive and Non-Adhesive foam dressings. Wounds UK. 2009;5(1):17-26.
2. Smith & Nephew 2009. ALLEVYN Adhesive Dressing Physical Properties. Internal Report. DS/09/013/R7.
3. Bale S, Squires D, Varnon T, Walker A, Benbow M, Harding K. A comparison of two dressings in pressure sore management. J Wound Care. 1997;6(10):463-466.
4. Smith & Nephew 2019. Use of Moisture Vapour Permeability* (MVP) and Moisture Vapour Transmission Rate** (MVTR) data to support product claims referring to moist wound healing. Internal Report. EO.AWM.PCSgen.001.v2.
5. Bale S, Squires D, Varnon T, Walker A, Benbow M, Harding K. A comparison of two dressings in pressure sore management. J Wound Care. 1997;6(10):463-466.
6. Amione P, Ricci E, Topo F, et al. Comparison of Allevyn Adhesive and Biatain Adhesive in the management of pressure ulcers. J Wound Care. 2005;14(8):365-370.
7. Smith + Nephew 2006. Comparison of the permeability of old ALLEVYN™ Adhesive and new modified ALLEVYN Adhesive. Data on File. 0601003.
8. Cassino R, Ricci E, Carusone A, Mercanti A. A conformable hydrogel in the debridement of complex necrotic wounds. Poster presented at: EWMA1997; Milan.
9. Chamorro AM, Vidal Thomas MC, Mieras AS, et al. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of hydrocellular and hydrocolloid dressings for treatment of category II pressure ulcers in patients at primary and long-term care institutions. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;94:179-185.
10. Smith & Nephew 1997. Histological demonstration of cellular debris within ALLEVYN dressing. Internal Report. HIS/044.
11. Smith & Nephew 2018. Volunteer Evaluation of Wound Care Dressing Product Features. Internal Report. AWM/AWC/001/v1.
12. Smith & Nephew 2006. An open, randomised, prospective, within volunteer comparison of the dressing retention properties of Mepilex border compared with two types of standard ALLEVYN Adhesive. Internal Report. VTSR/HVT018.
13. Thomas S, Young S. Exudate-handling mechanisms of two foam-film dressings. J Wound Care. 2008;17(7):309-315.
14. Young S, Bielby A, Milne J. Use of ultrasound to characterise the fluid-handling characteristics of four foam dressings. J Wound Care. 2007;16(10):425-428, 430-431.
15. Martini L, Reali U, Borgognoni L, Brandani P, Andriessen A. Comparison of two dressings in the management of partial-thickness donor sites. J Wound Care. 1999;8(9):457-460.
16. Avanzi A, Martinelli M, Accardi S, Giraudi C, Peroli P. Adhesive Hydrocullar Dressing vs Hydrocolloid Dressing in the Management of 2nd and 3rd Degree Pus. Poster presented at: Eighth European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; April 26-28, 1998; Madrid, Spain.
17. Smith & Nephew 2015. Product Safety Statement - ALLEVYN Adhesive. Internal Report. 185.
18. Smith+Nephew 2000. CT 9336 Analysis of Dressing Performance at the Sacrum Location. Internal Report. CT 9336.
19. Smith & Nephew 1996. A multi-centre pilot study to investigate the physical performance of a novel Allevyn Adhesive dressing. Internal Report. SR/00000/CT9336.