The JOURNEY◊ II UK Unicompartmental Knee System is an implant for partial knee replacement and available with OXINIUM◊ Technology. It’s designed to preserve the healthy parts of your knee while replacing the damaged areas.
The JOURNEY◊ II UK Unicompartmental Knee System is an implant for partial knee replacement. It’s designed to preserve the healthy parts of your knee while replacing the damaged areas, and it’s available with our award-winning1 material, OXINIUM◊ Technology.
The JOURNEY II UK System is designed specifically for partial knee replacement. In this procedure, only one area of the knee joint is replaced. Typically, this is either the medial (inside) or lateral (outside) area of the knee. Patients who have partial replacement often report less pain and a quicker recovery than patients who have full knee replacement. 2
The JOURNEY II UK System is available with OXINIUM Technology, our award-winning1 metal alloy made of oxidized zirconium. We engineered the material for strength and durability, and to provide patients with a long-lasting implant.3-9 Talk to your surgeon to learn more about the importance of materials in your knee implant.
Partial knee replacement offers several advantages over full knee replacement. With partial replacement, you can expect:
To find out if the JOURNEY II UK System is a treatment option, make an appointment with an orthopaedic surgeon. The surgeon will examine your knee and review your health situation in determining if partial replacement is recommended. Not every patient is a candidate for partial knee replacement.
Learn more about the procedure and recovery process.
All surgery has risks and the potential for complications. Talk to your surgeon about any concerns you may have before you decide on treatment. Some of the possible risks and complications for knee replacement include:
Blood clotting
Blood clotting problems – such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) – may occur after surgery and interrupt normal blood flow. Your medical team may recommend medications and exercises to reduce the risk.
Infection
Infection may occur at the surgical site or elsewhere in the body. If a serious infection occurs, additional surgery or removal of the implant may be needed.
Pneumonia
After surgery, pneumonia or other breathing problems may develop. Your medical team may recommend measures to reduce the risk.
Nerve problems
Nerves or blood vessels in the knee area may be damaged during surgery.
Long-term pain and stiffness in the knee
Most patients experience pain relief after knee replacement, but some may continue to have pain. Similarly, some patients may develop joint stiffness. Following the recovery guidelines provided by your medical team may help reduce this risk.
Implant wear or failure
The knee implant may become worn, loose, or damaged. It may not perform as expected. In some cases, another surgery may be needed to correct or replace the implant.
This is not a complete list of risks. In some cases, you may need additional surgery to address a complication. Talk to your surgeon about the possible risks for your specific health situation.
All information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and is not meant as medical advice. Not everyone is a candidate for the JOURNEY◊ II UK Unicompartmental Knee System with OXINIUM◊ Technology, and individual results of joint replacement will vary. Implants are intended to relieve knee pain and improve function but may not produce the same feel or function as your original knee. Every patient's case is unique and each patient should follow his or her doctor's specific instructions. Potential risks include loosening, wear, and infection that may result in the need for additional surgery. Discuss your implant options with your surgeon. Please discuss nutrition, medication, and treatment options with your doctor to make sure you are getting the proper care for your particular situation. If you are seeking this information in an emergency, please call 911 and seek emergency help.
◊Trademark of Smith+Nephew. 40707 10/2023
1.2005 ASM International Engineering Materials Achievement Award.
2.American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons website. Accessed August 14, 2023.
https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/en/treatment/unicompartmental-knee-replacement
3.Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) 2022. Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty Annual Report.
4.Sheth NP, Lementowski P, Hunter G, Garino JP. Clinical applications of oxidized zirconium. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2008;17(1):17-26.
5.Long M, Riester L, Hunter G. Nano-hardness Measurements of Oxidized Zr-2.5Nb and Various Orthopaedic Materials. 24th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials. April 22-26, 1998.
6.Lee JK, Maruthainar K, Wardle N, Haddad F, Blunn GW. Increased force simulator wear testing of a zirconium oxide total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2009;16(4):269-274.
7.Papannagari R, Hines G, Sprague J. Long-term Wear Performance of an Advanced Bearing Technology for TKA. Poster presented at: ORS 2011 Annual Meeting.
8.Civinini R, Carulli C, Matassi F, Lepri AC, Sirleo L, Innocenti M. The Survival of Total Knee Arthroplasty: Current Data from Registries on Tribology: Review Article. HSS J. 2017 Feb;13(1):28-31.
9.Davis E, Pagkalos J, Kopjar B. Effect of Bearing Surface on Survival of Cementless and Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty: Study of Data in the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. JB JS Open Access. 2020;5(2):e0075.
10.Ho JC, Stitzlein RN, Green CJ, Stoner T and Froimson MI. Return to Sports Activity following UKA and TKA. J Knee Surg. 2016;29:254-259.
11.Witjes, S.Gouttebarge V, Paul P, et al. Return to Sports and Physical Activity After Total and Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis. Sports Med. 2016;46:269–292.
12Jennings, JM, Kleeman-Forsthuber LT, Bolognesi MP. Medial Unicompartmental Arthroplasty of the Knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018:00:1-11.
13.Noticewala MS et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty relieves pain and improves function more than total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2012;27(8) Suppl): 99-105.
14.Zuiderbaan HA, van der List JP, Khamaisy S, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: Which type of artificial joint do patients forget? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:681-686.
15.Willis-Owen CA, Brust K, Alsop H, Miraldo M, Cobb JP. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: An analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. The Knee. 2009;16:473–478.
16.Fabre-Aubrespy M, Ollivier M, Pesenti S, Parratte S, Argenson, JN. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 75 Results in Better Clinical Outcomes and Similar Survivorship Compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Matched Controlled Study. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:2668-2671.
17.Hauer G et al. Greater activity, better range of motion and higher quality of life following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparative case–control study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2020;140:231-7.
18.Kim MS, Koh IJ, Choi YJ, Lee JY, In Y. Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:1453-1459.
19.Jansen K et al. Satisfaction and functional outcomes in unicompartmental compared with total knee arthroplasty. JBJS Open. 2020;5(3):e20.
20.McAllister CM. The Role of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in Providing Maximal Performance and Satisfaction. J Knee Surg. 2008;21:286–292.
21.Von Keudell A, Sodha S, Collins J, Minas T, Fitz W, Gomoll AH. Patient satisfaction after primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: An agedependent analysis. The Knee. 2014;21:180–184.
Text