ORTHOPAEDICS

Prothèse totale de genou JOURNEY◊II Total Knee Arthroplasty

Although total knee replacement has proved to be a successful treatment for improving pain and function, patients still report unmet levels of satisfaction, experience functional limitations and demonstrate increased difficulties doing daily activities. These deficits in patient satisfaction are even higher with more active and demanding activities1,2

The anatomical shape of JOURNEY II is designed to help patients rediscover their normal through a smoother recovery,*3,4 improved function*4-8 and higher patient satisfaction*2,4-6

JOURNEY II TKA Hero 1.png

Normal shapes. Normal position. Normal motion

Reproduction of optimal kinematic patterns during TKA could be instrumental in improving patient satisfaction.11 The solution to providing patients with better overall satisfaction and functionality is to design an implant as close to the normal knee as possible.

JOURNEY II has been shown to restore anatomical shape, position and motion.9,10,12-14 This anatomical restoration can provide superior clinical outcomes that can lead to high patient satisfaction.*3-5,8,15

JOURNEY II TKA Hero 2.png

Product Features

The Procedure

Recovery Information

Risks

Disclaimer

*Comparé aux genoux non-JOURNEY II.

Ce principe de conception est donné uniquement à titre pédagogique et informatif. Il ne s’agit pas d’un avis médical. Il revient aux médecins concernés de déterminer et d’utiliser les produits et les techniques appropriés en fonction de leur propre jugement clinique pour chacun de leurs patients.

Pour obtenir plus d’informations sur ce produit, y compris les indications d’utilisation, contre-indications, effets, précautions et avertissements, consulter le mode d’emploi du produit avant de l’utiliser.

Citations
  1. Scott CEH, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92-B(9):1253-1258.
  2. Noble P.C, et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470(1):20-32
  3. Mayman DJ, et al. Affiche présentée à : ISPOR Symposium ; 19-23 mai 2018 ; Baltimore, Maryland, États-Unis
  4. Nodzo SR, et al. Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2018;33(1):37-41.
  5. Murakami K, et al. Int Orthop. 2018;42(11):2573-2581.
  6. Di Benedetto P, et al. Acta Biomed 2019; Vol. 90, Supplement 12: 91-97.
  7. Kosse NM, et al. Affiche présentée au 2nd World Arthroplasty Congress ; 19–21 avril 2018 ; Rome, Italie.
  8. Takubo A, et al. J Knee Surg. 2017;30(7):725-729.
  9. Grieco T, et al. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(2):565-571.
  10. Smith LA, et al. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:1445-1454.
  11. Van Onsem S, et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2020) 478:255-263.
  12. Iriuchishima T, et al. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(6):568-572.
  13. Murakami K, et al. J Orthop. 2018;15(2):650-654.
  14. Carpenter RD, et al. Knee. 2009;16(5):332-336.
  15. Noble PC, et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005(431):157-165.
  16. Kaneko T, et al. J Orthop. 2017;14(1):201-206.
  17. Brilhault J, et al. Knee. 2010;17(2):148-151.
  18. Catani F, et al. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(12):1569-1575.
  19. Hyodo K, et al. Arthroplasty Today. 2020;6(3):338-342.
  20. Hada M, et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(6):1709-1716.
  21. Smith+Nephew 2012. Rapport interne. JRN2 KneeSim Analysis Memo.

Title

Text

Explore